Compare Proposal

Nothing to compare.

Data Mining - It is an academic assignment needs to be completed.

  • Posted at : 2 months ago
  • Post Similar Project
20

Budget
9
Proposals
225
Views
Expired
Status
Skills Required

Posted By -

NK

0.0
Projects Posted : 2
Projects Paid : 0
Services Purchased : 0
Total Spent :
0
Feedbacks : 0 %

Project Details show (+) hide (-)

Phase 1: (3 marks)

 

You should perform a literature review on the above topic and
include all relevant references in your report, no more than 2,000 words. 


You should cover the topic in a coherent manner.  This must be done by reference to the
relevant literature, so the bibliography is an important part of the research
and should contain complete references for current or recent research in the
field. You should abstract information from the literature you read using your
own words, instead of merely repeating what is said on the sources you
use.  Cite all relevant references,
including on-line references.  Failure to
do this could result in a penalty due to plagiarism. Your research must be
your own work. Check your final document using SafeAssign Tab in Blackboard.


 

 

You will need to search in a digital library to do this
research. You can find the necessary information in scholarly sources, which
reside on the SDL (Saudi Digital Library) using Microsoft Edge.

 

Note: Science and technology rapidly advances;
therefore, "old "stuff," other than as background information,
can be misleading and lead to wrong conclusions. Look for possible topics and
background information in specialized encyclopedias, we preferred recent
resources from 2015 and after, but if you need and old one for background
information you can back to these resources to clarify concepts. 


 

 

 

Phase 2: (3 marks)

 

Use WEKA to analyze the dataset you choose with different classification
algorithms
similar to the work did in the attached paper:


 

1.    
Repeat
what the researcher did in his research (scientific paper attached) to obtain
similar results (Experimental and results section).


2.    
Evaluate
your result and present it in clear way.


3.    
Compare
your results with the researcher's results.


4.    
Justify
any difference between the results.


 

 

 

Phase 3: (2 marks)

 

Try
to improve the researcher results by applying the same dataset in to different algorithm
(classification methods, pre-processing steps, parameters) then, observing
their impact on the results.

 

For
example,

1.     In the decision
tree algorithm J48, you can use different values of the confidence factor
parameter which determines the amount of pruning.


2.     In KNN classifier,
you can vary the value the parameter K.


3.     Use different
feature selection method as pre-processing step to choose a subset of
attributes or construct new attributes and see the impact on the results.


 

 When you deliver any improvement in the results,
Show the process and the results in details:


 

1.    
Which
setting did you try?


2.    
How
reliable are the results?


3.    
What
evaluation measure did you use to compare your results with the researcher
results?